Delhi restaurant owner Gagandeep Singh Sapra has publicly accused Zomato of manipulating rider allocations, claiming his outlet, Tadka Rani in Greater Kailash 1, is repeatedly marked as “unavailable” on the platform during peak hours despite being fully operational. Sapra shared a screen recording on X showing his restaurant listed as unavailable while several nearby eateries continued to receive delivery partners, raising questions about platform fairness and transparency.
The issue, according to Sapra, has persisted for more than 30 days despite multiple escalations to Zomato’s support teams. “Here’s video proof of how rider allocation is being manipulated,” he wrote, noting that neighboring restaurants within a 50-meter radius were receiving orders without disruption.
The complaint quickly went viral, sparking industry debate about the power and control large food delivery platforms hold over partner restaurants. Responding publicly, Zomato’s food delivery CEO Aditya Mangla acknowledged the concern and said the company would investigate. “Thank you for sharing this. I’m getting this checked,” Mangla wrote in response to Sapra’s post.
Sapra expressed cautious appreciation for the CEO’s engagement but reiterated frustration with the lack of resolution. “I have written to all your team members and have several meetings. Yesterday was the 31st day, and no one seems to see a resolve,” he commented.
In subsequent posts, Sapra alleged that the platform’s actions could be motivated by commission strategies. “It’s all a game to increase their commission, from the current 52% on sales to potentially as high as 99% of each transaction. The greed is not ending,” he wrote, adding that internal mismanagement may have contributed to what he described as a “rigged system.”
While Zomato has not provided a detailed public explanation beyond the CEO’s statement, the incident highlights growing concerns among restaurant partners about operational transparency, algorithmic control, and the financial pressures imposed by platform-driven commission models in India’s highly competitive food delivery ecosystem.
The case continues to unfold as both the restaurant owner and the platform navigate public scrutiny and attempts at resolution.










